North Carolina Legislature Says Hear No Evil Sea No Evil

House in South Nags Head
The North Carolina Legislature has officially crossed over into crazy. Two prominent bills widely reported on by the national media in recent weeks want to remove science from decision-making processes, deliberately putting North Carolinians in harm’s way. One of these bills would outlaw the use of scientifically-formulated sea level rise projections in coastal regulations and policies and legislate what selective data will be allowed to be used. While this might seem like a dystopian George Orwell or Ayn Rand novel, it is actually today’s North Carolina state legislature.
The North Carolina House of Representatives may vote on this bill as early as tonight! If you’re a NC resident, click here to make a difference NOW!
Specifically this bill would outlaw the use of projections of accelerated rates of sea level rise caused by global warming (which predicts a few feet of sea level rise by 2100) and instead limit regulatory authorities to using only historical data to predict future sea level rise (which would end up being about 8 inches of sea level rise by 2100).
Following this same logic, comedian Stephen Colbert points out that by basing predictions of the future solely on historical data:
if we consider only historical data, I’ve been alive my entire life. Therefore, I always will be. And, if you extrapolate my life from the critical periods of age 8 to 18, I will grow to be over 20 feet tall.
Clearly this reasoning doesn’t work. And furthermore, it’s dangerous. Just ask the tens millions of Americans who lost their life savings in the post-2007 recession by optimistically investing under the assumption of the economy maintaining its upward trend. Unfortunately, and perhaps to the detriment of local coastal residents, the past does not always equate to the future.

Elizabeth City with 1.5 meters sea level rise. Courtesy Architecture 2030.
As the News & Observer recently reported, local city officials are concerned about this new policy. It will “tie their hands,” be “overly restrictive,” and make it unable for communities to chart the course of action that is right for themselves. And it seems like an especially bad policy in comparison to other states that are actively embracing planning: Maine is preparing for a rise of up to 2 meters by 2100, Delaware 1.5 meters, Louisiana 1 meter and California 1.4 meters. Southeastern Florida projects up to a 2-foot rise by 2060.
The actions of the NC state legislature should be an outrage to coastal residents whose communities will be endangered and exposed to unnecessary liabilities, to state and local level regulatory and planning agencies who will have their authority usurped, and to proponents of decentralization of political power (looking at you, Tea Partiers) and to those residents in favor of climate action. These legislative idiocies are in insult to the people of North Carolina and should be abandoned immediately. Not only do they make a mockery of the Legislature’s ability to reason, but they cause true harm to the communities these decision makers are supposed to be looking out for.
If you are a North Carolina resident, PLEASE CLICK HERE NOW to submit an email to your legislators and find your legislators’ phone numbers here.
See SACE’s video about sea level rise in North Carolina, “Treasure Places in Peril” here.
Tags: H819, North Carolina, S851, sea level rise, Stephen Colbert
2 Comments
Leave a comment




The NC CRC’s Science Panel & scientists:
- Used the Least Reliable Tide Gauge Data in NC.
- Used Obsolete Reports
- Used only One-sided Sea Level Rise reports
- Used only One-sided Global Warming reports,
- Admitted they did no science, only a “Literature Search”.
- No 4 miles inundation of NC Tidelands over 150 years is visible .
- Ignored US Coast Survey , and US Fish Services Tide Gauge Data 1850 1950.
- Said, ‘What’s the Big Deal, Let’s wait 5 Years and see what happens.’
- Reports confuse Erosion due to dredging, winds, waves and currents with Inundation.
- Have not answered questions about the above concerns.
Thankfully, it looks like NC Legislators want verifiable Science upon which to base multi billion dollar public policy decisions that could harm tens of thousands of local, taxpaying property owners.
This is serious business, and it’s good NC doesn’t base decisions on a comedy skit.
Bill Price Pine Knoll Shores
PS: It might be helpful to urge the Science Panel to participate in an Open Public Forum to answer above and other questions about their science.
So far they have declined.
Comment by Bill Price on June 13, 2012 8:24 pm
@Bill Price
It sounds like you have concerns about the scientific process. That is valid. And if your questions are being fairly and respectfully posed, and you’re not getting answers, that’s a problem.
However, the way to fix that is continued, persistent dialogue. Legislating science is not a solution. What H819 seeks to do is control the scientific process to achieve a desired outcome. That’s not good science. It’s also not good public policy.
I’m a fifth generation North Carolinian. I lived half my youth in Hampstead, two miles from the ocean. I too am concerned about property owners, taxpayers, and the economy. Which is why I want the best science applied to land-use planning, bridge-building, insurance regulations, etc., in our coastal areas. Good policy based on good science will help North Carolina avoid making stupid mistakes that are more expensive in the long run.
Laws that dictate the data scientists can use is a recipe for making stupid mistakes in policymaking and infrastructure development. That gets to be very expensive.
Comment by John Bonitz on June 19, 2012 12:16 pm