<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: New Investment in Coal is a Risky Proposition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2011/03/09/report-new-investment-in-coal-is-a-risky-proposition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2011/03/09/report-new-investment-in-coal-is-a-risky-proposition/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:29:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Librada Whelchel</title>
		<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2011/03/09/report-new-investment-in-coal-is-a-risky-proposition/comment-page-1/#comment-147540</link>
		<dc:creator>Librada Whelchel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cleanenergy.org/?p=12490#comment-147540</guid>
		<description>The term &quot;alternative&quot; presupposes a set of undesirable energy technologies against which &quot;alternative energies&quot; are contrasted. As such, the list of energy technologies excluded is an indicator of which problems the alternative technologies are intended to address. Controversies regarding dominant sources of energy and their alternatives have a long history. The nature of what was regarded alternative energy sources has changed considerably over time, and today, because of the variety of energy choices and differing goals of their advocates, defining some energy types as &quot;alternative&quot; is highly controversial.*

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The term &#8220;alternative&#8221; presupposes a set of undesirable energy technologies against which &#8220;alternative energies&#8221; are contrasted. As such, the list of energy technologies excluded is an indicator of which problems the alternative technologies are intended to address. Controversies regarding dominant sources of energy and their alternatives have a long history. The nature of what was regarded alternative energy sources has changed considerably over time, and today, because of the variety of energy choices and differing goals of their advocates, defining some energy types as &#8220;alternative&#8221; is highly controversial.*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
