Comments on: EPA Rules Mean Big Challenges Ahead for Dirty Coal

By: Taber Law Group » Blog Archive » January 31, 2010 – Environmental Law and Climate Change Law News, Vol. 2, No. 4

Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:21:30 +0000

[...] EPA Rules Mean Big Challenges Ahead for Dirty Coal. – Ulla Reeves, Clean Energy, January 27, 2010 In recent months, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has taken great strides to improve air quality and protect the environment by proposing stricter standards for ozone and sulfur dioxide, and begin regulation of coal ash waste and greenhouse gases. If these standards and regulations are implemented, they could inhibit the development of new coal-fired power plants by creating such a strict regulatory environment that utility companies will have fewer incentives to push dirty coal and more incentives to pursue clean energy alternatives. The ozone and sulfur dioxide standards are open for public comment and we hope you might take a chance to support stronger rules to protect public health. Click Here [...]

By: Murodhy

Murodhy — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:21:03 +0000

Resources like the one you mentioned here will be very useful to me! I will post a link to this page on my blog. I am sure my visitors will find that very useful.

By: CleanEnergy Footprints » Archive » EPA Rules Mean Big Challenges … Contact

CleanEnergy Footprints » Archive » EPA Rules Mean Big Challenges … Contact — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:05:27 +0000

[...] the original: CleanEnergy Footprints » Archive » EPA Rules Mean Big Challenges … Tags: airbender, are-implemented, category, especially-well, getting-down, new-coal-fired, [...]

By: hydroponics

hydroponics — Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:57:00 +0000

Many people was really fun of gardening.I am sure they will be very interested in this post because they will learn something that they can use about gardening.

By: Answer Phones Round The Clock With A Virtual Auto Attendant … | Key Concepts Marketing Wisdom

Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:37:30 +0000

[...] CleanEnergy Footprints » Archive » EPA Rules Mean Big Challenges … [...]

By: Geoff Henderson

Geoff Henderson — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:47:38 +0000

Good for the EPA, good for Obama for giving EPA some Substance again, and good for the USA for working meaningfully on the problem. Hopefully the politics won’t ruin a chance for a lifetime…

Climate sceptics should understand that the spoiling of our environment cannot continue. Climate change argument hinges largely around what is causing the change, and whether we can do anything about it. Placing the ‘what’ and ‘whether’ to one side, the need to stop ruining the environment is indisputable.

The EPA has a charge to protect the environment. It should be allowed to do just that. It should itself be protected from undue influence from vested interests, whilst keeping itself fully informed of all facets. Give it support, let it make the difference.

informed.

By: Melissa Hendricks

Melissa Hendricks — Wed, 27 Jan 2010 16:45:53 +0000

Say “YES” to recycling coal ash and “NO” to fear tactics that label coal ash “hazardous” and “toxic” against overwhelming scientifically sound evidence
to the contrary. For factual information on coal ash from sources who are EXPERTS on these materials, please visit: http://www.acaa-usa.org