<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waxman-Markey Zeroes Renewable Energy Standard, Drops Efficiency Sharply</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 00:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: M Y</title>
		<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>M Y</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cleanenergy.org/?p=1285#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Is it scary that  a former Enron day trader is leading the Renewable energy push?  This is the same guy that led  the rolling blackouts in California.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it scary that  a former Enron day trader is leading the Renewable energy push?  This is the same guy that led  the rolling blackouts in California.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne Raymond</title>
		<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeanne Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 21:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cleanenergy.org/?p=1285#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I would like to make it clear that I think nuclear power plants are not clean energy.  They should not be encouraged or funded.  They are dirty, polluting, hazardous, with long lasting costs, transportation and storage problems.  Energy standards should not encourage nuclear energy or plants, new or old.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to make it clear that I think nuclear power plants are not clean energy.  They should not be encouraged or funded.  They are dirty, polluting, hazardous, with long lasting costs, transportation and storage problems.  Energy standards should not encourage nuclear energy or plants, new or old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waxman-Markey renewable standards: Hawai&#8217;i&#8217;s way ahead of them &#124; Hawaii Travel</title>
		<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-78</link>
		<dc:creator>Waxman-Markey renewable standards: Hawai&#8217;i&#8217;s way ahead of them &#124; Hawaii Travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cleanenergy.org/?p=1285#comment-78</guid>
		<description>[...] D. Wilson, Research Director, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, summarized his reaction, at the blog CleanEnergy.org, this way: “The American Clean Energy and Security Act has many good provisions&#8230; But the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] D. Wilson, Research Director, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy, summarized his reaction, at the blog CleanEnergy.org, this way: “The American Clean Energy and Security Act has many good provisions&#8230; But the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol Gruba</title>
		<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol Gruba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cleanenergy.org/?p=1285#comment-76</guid>
		<description>You may want to see economist Steve Stoft's slides and a summary here: http://carolsenergynotes.wordpress.com/. He is a critic of the Waxman bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may want to see economist Steve Stoft&#8217;s slides and a summary here: <a href="http://carolsenergynotes.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://carolsenergynotes.wordpress.com/</a>. He is a critic of the Waxman bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L. W. Fank, P.E.</title>
		<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>L. W. Fank, P.E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cleanenergy.org/?p=1285#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Pretty obvious - we have a bunch of much too well-insulated sclerotic old f**ts in Congress (BOTH parties!);  they do not understand that they are a MAJOR part of the problem; the only question important to them is "How do I get re-elected?"

Thus, to them it's still "business as usual" - in private, we do whatever horse-trading gets us the most lobbying $$; in public we act like we've stuck up for our constituents, by signing onto an ineffectual law, and we go back to the payola party". 

They are too old, and too well insulated from the reality of life on this planet, to understand that we cannot continue to play the same games (In ancient Italy, it was "fiddling, while Rome burned") They don't understand that we have used up too many of the World's resources, destroyed too much of its self-renewing capacity, polluted too much of its air, to ever return to unregulated carbon energy and/or unregulated capitalism. They don't understand, and don't even understand that there is a need to understand,  that "a growing economy" is only the most deadly option of all, if these changes are not made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty obvious - we have a bunch of much too well-insulated sclerotic old f**ts in Congress (BOTH parties!);  they do not understand that they are a MAJOR part of the problem; the only question important to them is &#8220;How do I get re-elected?&#8221;</p>
<p>Thus, to them it&#8217;s still &#8220;business as usual&#8221; - in private, we do whatever horse-trading gets us the most lobbying $$; in public we act like we&#8217;ve stuck up for our constituents, by signing onto an ineffectual law, and we go back to the payola party&#8221;. </p>
<p>They are too old, and too well insulated from the reality of life on this planet, to understand that we cannot continue to play the same games (In ancient Italy, it was &#8220;fiddling, while Rome burned&#8221;) They don&#8217;t understand that we have used up too many of the World&#8217;s resources, destroyed too much of its self-renewing capacity, polluted too much of its air, to ever return to unregulated carbon energy and/or unregulated capitalism. They don&#8217;t understand, and don&#8217;t even understand that there is a need to understand,  that &#8220;a growing economy&#8221; is only the most deadly option of all, if these changes are not made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Presidential Race, 2016: Rod Smith Endorses Keith Ellison &#124; IPR Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Presidential Race, 2016: Rod Smith Endorses Keith Ellison &#124; IPR Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cleanenergy.org/?p=1285#comment-73</guid>
		<description>[...] To Waxman’s credit, he voted against granting telcoms retroactive immunity for their role in illegal domestic spying. But, a handful of apparent concessions to small farmers aside, his new Food Safety bill might stand the government’s most concerted assault to date on our right to just say no to agribiz’s forced fake food agenda. Regarding Network Neutrality, he waffles with a vengeance. (Dig this crazy list of contributors to see why he’s currently, uh, waxing “con.”) And why did he he help make the currently pending American Clean Energy and Security Act so ridiculously toothless? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] To Waxman’s credit, he voted against granting telcoms retroactive immunity for their role in illegal domestic spying. But, a handful of apparent concessions to small farmers aside, his new Food Safety bill might stand the government’s most concerted assault to date on our right to just say no to agribiz’s forced fake food agenda. Regarding Network Neutrality, he waffles with a vengeance. (Dig this crazy list of contributors to see why he’s currently, uh, waxing “con.”) And why did he he help make the currently pending American Clean Energy and Security Act so ridiculously toothless? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Confirms Analysis of Renewable Electricity Standard &#124; Eco Friendly Mag</title>
		<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-66</link>
		<dc:creator>Southern Alliance for Clean Energy Confirms Analysis of Renewable Electricity Standard &#124; Eco Friendly Mag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:58:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cleanenergy.org/?p=1285#comment-66</guid>
		<description>[...] of the latest version of the bill still pending, it has been largely up to independent think tanks, advocates and bloggers to take a critical look at the major provisions in the nearly 1,000-page climate and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the latest version of the bill still pending, it has been largely up to independent think tanks, advocates and bloggers to take a critical look at the major provisions in the nearly 1,000-page climate and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celebrity Paycut - Encouraging celebrities all over the world to save us from global warming by taking a paycut.</title>
		<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Celebrity Paycut - Encouraging celebrities all over the world to save us from global warming by taking a paycut.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cleanenergy.org/?p=1285#comment-61</guid>
		<description>[...] of the latest version of the bill still pending, it has been largely up to independent think tanks, advocates and bloggers to take a critical look at the major provisions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the latest version of the bill still pending, it has been largely up to independent think tanks, advocates and bloggers to take a critical look at the major provisions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CleanEnergy Footprints » Archive » Waxman-Markey Zeroes Renewable &#8230; at Interblogs</title>
		<link>http://blog.cleanenergy.org/2009/06/04/renewable-electricity-standard/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>CleanEnergy Footprints » Archive » Waxman-Markey Zeroes Renewable &#8230; at Interblogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 21:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.cleanenergy.org/?p=1285#comment-58</guid>
		<description>[...] CleanEnergy Footprints » Archive » Waxman-Markey Zeroes Renewable &#8230;     Filed under: Alternative Energy   &#160;&#160;&#124;&#160;&#160;      &#160;        Insert you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] CleanEnergy Footprints » Archive » Waxman-Markey Zeroes Renewable &#8230;     Filed under: Alternative Energy   &nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;      &nbsp;        Insert you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
